Mandate

CANA mandate

CANA is a family-governed foundation focused on health, education, and livelihoods in Enugu, delivering stability through defined programmes and partner-led delivery.

Problem definition

Household stability gaps

Households lose access to schooling, care, and income when shocks occur because support is fragmented and poorly timed.

The mandate defines scope, criteria, and exclusions so that support is structured, documented, and reviewed.

Methodology

Mandate statements

The mandate is expressed through concise statements that guide every programme and decision.

The foundation stabilises households experiencing hardship by delivering targeted assistance that is documented, time-bound, and reviewed.

Programmes are designed to prevent the loss of schooling, health access, or housing when a household faces a shock. Each programme sets criteria, reporting cadence, and review checkpoints.

Delivery is channelled through accountable partners so that support remains traceable and governed under agreed standards.

The foundation maintains a calm, institutional posture: no campaign language, no urgency appeals, and a focus on reliability over volume.

Operating principles

Principles applied across all programmes and operations.

Principle 1
Structured assistance with clear entry and exit criteria.
Principle 2
Partnership-first delivery with accountable local institutions.
Principle 3
Documentation and review before, during, and after support.
Principle 4
Privacy, safety, and dignity protected at every step.

Scope

Where and how the mandate is applied.

Primary scope: households facing hardship within the foundation’s current programme geographies.

Programme types: stability support, education continuity, health access, and livelihood recovery.

Geographic focus: Enugu and surrounding jurisdictions; expansion criteria are [TBD].

Delivery channels: partner organisations with clear governance and reporting capability.

Exclusions: activities outside the approved programme envelopes or without partner accountability.

Review cadence: annual mandate review with board sign-off; adjustments are recorded in publications.

Jurisdiction

Legal and oversight context for the foundation’s work.

Legal status: [TBD].

Governance: board oversight recorded in the governance register.

Reporting: publications list governance and programme artefacts.

Documentation: interventions and approvals are recorded in programme files.

Data handling: privacy protocols are [TBD] pending legal review.

Accountability: grievances route through formal intake and review.

Participation

Engagement path

Support CANA by funding defined programmes, partnering on delivery, or contributing professional expertise.

Participation routes are documented through the contact channel and reviewed against programme scope.